KASUS SIPADAN DAN LIGITAN PDF
Souveraineté sur Pulau Ligitan et Pulau Sipadan (ZndonésielMalaisie), arrêt, C. I. J. found tlieir claims to the islands of Ligitan and Sipadan. Penelitian lebih lanjut mengenai masalah kepemilikan Pulau Sipadan dan Ligitan membawa kasus ini ke Mahkamah Internasional adalah putusan politik . PENGARUH PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH INTERNASIONAL TERHADAP KASUS SIPADAN DAN LIGITAN DALAM PENERAPAN BATAS WILAYAH.
|Published (Last):||10 February 2009|
|PDF File Size:||14.13 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||7.50 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Metadata Show full item record.
Malaysia however denied the allegation of an agreement between them, maintaining that the islands have always been part of the territory of its sioadan of Sabah. The Philippines had applied during the proceedings to intervene over the case on the basis of their claim to northern Borneo. Thesis S1 Uncontrolled Keywords: Collections Skripsi Sarjana . This page was last edited on 11 Septemberat Government of the Philippines.
But as Malaysia’s predecessor, Great Britainsignificantly developed the islands compared to Indonesia’s predecessor, the Netherlandsespecially after Malaysia’s formation as a nation the court using this as the main reason decided to award the islands to Malaysia based on their “effective occupation”.
Moreover, for data analysis the writer use descriptive qualitative.
The problem of this research is how the effect of International Court of Justice decision in case of Sipadan and Ligitan between Indonesia and Malaysia to forming national Law sipadsn regional boundary of the State. This is confirmed in the Report of International Court of Justice August 1 to July 31,the decision of the International Court of Justice conducted through bargaining or bargaining led by the presiding judge Gilbert Guillaume of France who determined Malaysia has sovereignty over Sipadan and ,igitan islands.
Ligitan and Sipadan dispute
Retrieved 13 September More information and software credits. Views Read Edit View history. Text Bab I 1HK Archived from the original on 5 March Abstract Indonesia’s diplomatic relations with friendly countries especially with Malaysia was formally established since 31 August when Malaysia declared its independence.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. The dispute arises from the application of different principles to the determination of the boundaries of the continental shelf among neighboring countries, causing a region of overlap which can cause disputes.
The uncertainty of state boundaries and territorial status is often a source of dispute among nations adjacent or adjacent.
This research is a type of qualitative research using descriptive method. The main data sources for this research came from Primary Data and Secondary Data. The court strongly rejected the Philippines’ attempt of intervention and in doing so cited that the request made by the Philippines did not relate to the subject matter of the case.
Both of the islands were originally considered as terra nullius. Territorial disputes in East, South, and Southeast Asia.
Ligitan and Sipadan are two small islands located in the Celebes Sea off the southeastern coast of the Malaysian state of Sabah. The dispute began in and was largely resolved by the International Court of Justice ICJ inwhich opined that both of the islands belonged to Malaysia.
Kasus Indonesia vs Malaysia by claudia hartono on Prezi
The reason for this inappropriate of Regional boundary of the State Law because the existence of Sipadan and Ligitan island which become the basic decision in drawing the siladan baseline used as guidance to specify regional boundary of Indonesia are now belong to Malaysia. Archived from the original on 7 February International Court of Justice.
Text Halaman Judul 0HK ICJ awarded both islands to Malaysia based on “effective occupation”.