DODAF 2.0 VOLUME 1 PDF
Section 1 is the Introduction to this volume. Section 2 .. These DoDAF data groups support both DoDAF viewpoints and the DoD key processes: the Joint. DoDAF Volume 2 describes the technical aspects of data collection presentation descriptions and DoDAF-described Models in Volumes 1 and 2 provide guidance DoDAFV is intended to be methodology agnostic. DoDAF Architecture Framework Version The Department of Defense Architecture Framework (DoDAF) is an architecture framework for . OV-1 High Level Operational Concept Graphic: High level graphical and .. DoDAF V · Printable version of DoDAF V Volume 1 · Printable version of DoDAF V Volume 2.
|Published (Last):||18 March 2008|
|PDF File Size:||5.81 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||14.88 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Each of these three levels of the DM2 voulme important to a particular viewer of Departmental processes:. The repository is defined by the common database schema Core Architecture Data Model 2. One concern about the DoDAF is how well these products meet actual stakeholder concerns for any given system of interest.
This page was last edited on 3 Octoberat In simpler terms, integration is seen in the connection from items common among dodsf products, where items shown in one architecture product such as sites used or systems interfaced or services provided should have the identical number, name, and meaning appear in related architecture product views.
Department of Defense Architecture Framework
It defines the type of information exchanged, the frequency of exchanges, the tasks and activities supported by these exchanges and the nature of the exchanges. The Capability Models describe capability taxonomy and capability evolution. In this manner, the DM2 supports the exchange and reuse of architectural information among JCAs, Components, and Federal and Coalition partners, thus facilitating the understanding and implementation of interoperability of processes and systems.
Definitions and Guidelines”, “II: Department of Defense for developing enterprise architecture has been debated:. Only a subset of the full DoDAF viewset is usually created for each system development. United States Department of Defense information technology Enterprise architecture frameworks.
Retrieved from ” https: Views Read Edit View history. The DoDAF deskbook provides examples in using traditional systems engineering and data engineering techniques, and secondly, UML format. Systems and services view SV is a set of graphical and textual products that describe systems and services and interconnections providing for, or supporting, DoD functions.
Integrated architectures are a property or design principle for architectures at all levels: The approach depends on the requirements and the expected results; i. The DM2 defines architectural data elements and enables the integration and federation of Architectural Descriptions.
The developing system must not only meet its internal data needs but also those of the operational framework into which it is set. While it is clearly aimed at military systems, DoDAF has broad applicability across the private, public and voluntary sectors around the world, and represents one of a large number of systems architecture frameworks. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
DoDAF has a meta-model underpinning the framework, defining the types of modelling elements that can be used in each view and the relationships between them. As the DM2 matures to meet the ongoing data requirements of process owners, decision makers, architects, and new technologies, it will evolve to a resource that more completely supports the requirements for architectural data, published in a consistently understandable way, and will enable greater ease for discovering, sharing, and reusing architectural data across organizational boundaries.
These views relate to stakeholder requirements for producing an Architectural Description. Product Descriptions” and a “Deskbook”. Technical standards view TV products define technical standards, implementation conventions, business rules and criteria that govern the architecture. There are many different approaches for creating an integrated architecture using DoDAF and for determining which products are required.
This document addressed usage, integrated architectures, DoD and Federal policies, value of architectures, architecture measures, DoD decision support processes, development techniques, analytical techniques, and the CADM v1. The figure represents the information that links the operational view, systems and services view, and technical standards view.
Department of Defense Architecture Framework – Wikipedia
The three views and their interrelationships — driven by common architecture data elements — provide the basis for deriving measures such as interoperability or performance, and for measuring the impact of the values of these vollume on operational mission and task effectiveness. These architecture descriptions may include families of systems FoSsystems of systems SoSand net-centric capabilities for interoperating and interacting in the non-combat environment.
The sequence of the artifacts listed below gives a suggested order in which the artifacts could be developed. Operational View OV products provide descriptions of the tasks and activities, operational elements, and information exchanges required to accomplish DoD missions. In Volune the Version 1.
TRAK Community :: Wiki :: DODAF
In addition to graphical representation, there is typically a requirement to provide metadata to the Defense Information Technology Portfolio Repository DITPR or other architectural repositories.
In other projects Wikimedia Commons. To facilitate the use of information at the data layer, the DoDAF describes a set of models for visualizing data through graphic, tabular, or textual means. The DoDAF provides a foundational framework for developing volums representing architecture descriptions that ensure a common denominator for understanding, comparing, and integrating architectures across organizational, joint, and multinational boundaries. Commons category link is on Wikidata. DoD weapons and information technology system acquisitions are required to develop and document an enterprise architecture EA using the views prescribed in the DoDAF.